Formal recognition of Liberia's sovereignty offered the government the opportunity to borrow on international markets that were growing rapidly during the second half of the nineteenth century. However, like other independent countries, Liberia would often find the terms on which it was able to borrow excessively costly, particularly as compared with colonized countries -- a gap described in literature on sovereign debt as the "empire effect." Literature on the "empire effect" has thus far neglected any region of Africa outside of South Africa. This chapter focuses on Liberia's efforts to borrow, beginning with the first loan the government raised in London in 1871. The terms of this loan were such that the government had little choice but to go into default. After renegotiating with its creditors, the Liberian government tried to return to the market but could only do so under what are described in the literature on sovereign debt as "supersanctions," or infringements on the sovereignty of the borrowing country as a condition of borrowing. Literature on supersanctions has speculated that they replicated formal colonial rule. By comparing Liberia's experience to that of British colonies in West Africa, this chapter shows that this was not the case: despite supersanctions which eventually extended the reach of foreign officials to include control over Liberia's finances and its military, investors overseas neverregarded Liberia as a sound investment.
WISER Seminar Papers
- WISER's TRUST seminar is hosted on-line every Monday afternoon from 16:00 - 17:00 SA time during the teaching semester. Forthcoming seminars are available here, and past events are detailed in our archive.
- Please register on Zoom in advance of the meeting on this link.
- Participants should please read the paper (below) prior to the seminar; it will typically be available by the Friday preceding the seminar.
In this semester, the Trust seminar will explore questions of credit and debt on the African continent. In contrast with the argument that trust and confidence are synonymous (most evident in the Edelman Trust Barometer and the reporting around it), some of the most convincing scholarship argues for the direct association of trust with credit. Other researchers, studying informal African institutions, have found credit everywhere on this continent, but little that can be associated with trust. Some state institutions (like SACCOs in Kenya) and simpler penalties, like efficient bankruptcy laws, seem also to be instrumental in shaping the politics of credit. One key driver of credit systems is a secondary market, which depends in part on institutions and information that derive from (and support) fiduciaries. These are especially important in the contemporary tensions between firm-based and individualised credit systems. The seminar series this semester will explore some of these dynamics, examining how they have shaped the cultures and politics of debt and credit from the precolonial to the contemporary period.
Presented by : Leigh Gardner
12 Aug 2026 - 4:00pm
WISER Research Theme: